Challenging the FCC’s Unlawful Open Internet Order (From Free State Foundation - Justin (Gus) Hurwitz) by Greg Karnes

August 13, 2015


Challenging the FCC’s Unlawful Open Internet Order (From Free State Foundation - Justin (Gus) Hurwitz)


The Federal Communications Commission’s Open Internet Order would expand the FCC’s authority far beyond what the Communications Act permits. The FCC is asserting a massive expansion of its regulatory authority to encompass basically the entirety of the Internet. The Commission has created a “Frankenorder” that bears no resemblance to Congressional intent. These were, of course, some of Verizon’s central arguments in its challenge to the FCC’s previous iteration of the Order. And in that case they were losing arguments, rejected by the DC Circuit. But recent Supreme Court decisions have strengthened the precedent on which Verizon had relied, and the Commission has doubled down on its claims of authority, claiming both more broadly and aggressively than it had before.

Saving Internet Freedom (From Heritage Foundation-James Gattuso) by Greg Karnes

June 03, 2015


Saving Internet Freedom


This Heritage Foundation Special Report details how to protect individuals, consumers, and national interests, while saving the Internet from falling prey to overzealous regulators or regimes and groups determined to limit free speech. This includes protecting consumers from new net neutrality regulations, increased internet governance by the federal government, e-mail digital privacy, preventing undue taxation of internet commerce, and striking a balance between copyright restrictions and internet sharing.

April 18, 2015


How to Break the Internet


The biggest threat to the Net isn't cable companies. It's government.

How to Break the Internet (from A Manne/R. Ben Sperry) by Greg Karnes

March 26, 2015


Regulating Net Neutrality: Who Will the FCC Really “Protect”?


The Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) new net neutrality rules are justified by the Commission as necessary to protect an “open Internet” for small, innovative content providers. However, the vague nature of the rules surely provides the opportunity for intense political lobbying as they are implemented in a rapidly-changing market environment. Deregulation has served consumers will in the communications sector. Given the massive economic stakes involved, future arguments over the meaning of the new Title II regulations will stimulate a major increase in litigation and Washington lobbying.

Adobe Acrobat document [220.7 KB]

March 12, 2015


Here are all 400 pages of the FCC’s net neutrality rules


February 25, 2015


Is the FCC lawless?

Is The FCC Lawless.pdf
Adobe Acrobat document [513.9 KB]

February 24, 2015


Watch Mark Cuban’s Surgical Takedown of Net Neutrality — And Why He Says Everyone Should ‘Hack Themselves’

February 20, 2015


Regulating the Most Powerful Network Ever


The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has embarked on one of the most aggressive expansions of authority of any agency in our nation’s history. Clothing its efforts in the statutory ambiguity of the Communications Act’s dated and circular definitions and taking comfort in the opinions from the Judge in Brand-X does not change this fact. As FCC Chairman Wheeler has made clear, the Internet is different in kind (in scale, scope, and nature) from what the FCC was granted authority to regulate. In giving the FCC authority in 1934 to regulate the telephone monopoly, and again in 1996 to unwind and eventually deregulate that monopoly, Congress did not give the FCC authority to regulate the Internet.

Adobe Acrobat document [285.2 KB]

February 20, 2015


Regulation Won’t Preserve a Dynamic and “Open” Internet


Why would the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) believe that by regulating broadband providers in the name of preserving “network neutrality” would benefit consumers? Answer: it will prevent the Internet service distributors from discriminating against nascent upstream innovators and protect the “Open Internet”. But, for more than three decades, innovation and entry in this sector have occurred because the FCC has been forced to relinquish its regulatory grip. The market suggests that discrimination may not even be profitable for Internet service providers, and the FCC is about to adopt its new net neutrality rules without significant evidence that there is a problem to address. The history of FCC regulation demonstrates convincingly that the agency should wait until marketplace evidence provides a different conclusion. It could be a long wait.

Adobe Acrobat document [210.2 KB]

February 18, 2015

Billionaire Mark Cuban Says Net Neutrality Will ‘F*ck Everything Up’

February 9, 2015

Senator Blasts Net Neutrality as the Creation of a ‘Department of the Internet’

February 6, 2015

FCC Commissioner Pai's Statement.pdf
Adobe Acrobat document [97.6 KB]

January 30, 2015

Net Neutrality: Internet Regulation Debate Far from Over

Barring any unforeseen developments, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is inexorably moving toward adopting rules restricting the activities of Internet Service Providers. But the February 26 vote will not be the end of this long-running debate. Even without a bipartisan compromise, the FCC’s action can still be largely blocked by appropriations rider in Congress, and by a nearly certain court challenge. This issue is far from settled.

Net Neutrality-Internet Regulation Debat[...]
Adobe Acrobat document [88.9 KB]

December 18, 2014

Eight Myths About FCC Regulation of the Internet

Proposed FCC regulation of the Internet, widely called “net neutrality” regulation, is as misunderstood as it is dangerous to the digital revolution and the U.S. economy. Rather than a long-standing set of rules that have protected innovators, net neutrality is a recently articulated idea that threatens innovation. Rather than a tool to introduce competition in a monopoly market, it would discourage competition in what is now a dynamic marketplace. These and other misconceptions obscure the lack of a compelling case for FCC regulation, and the dangers to Americans that such regulation would pose.

Eight Myths About FCC Regulation of the [...]
Adobe Acrobat document [155.0 KB]

November 25,2014

Beyond Hypothetical: How FCC Internet Regulation Would Hurt Consumers

Beyond Hypothetical FCC Internet Takeove[...]
Adobe Acrobat document [156.7 KB]

November 22, 2014

Price Discrimination Can Make the Internet Work Better

To see the problem with President Obama’s promotion of the idea of Network Neutrality, note that it attempts to outlaw practices—namely tiered services—that are normal in most other markets that are highly competitive and serve consumers very well.

Adobe Acrobat document [151.5 KB]

November 17, 2014

Ted Cruz to Obama: Don’t Mess with the Internet

November 8, 2012

The Fallacy of Net Neutrality: Thomas Hazlett on the FCC & Consumer Protection

Get in Touch With Me.

Call me at 405 810-8119 with any questions or to schedule an appointment.


Greg Karnes CPA

4301 NW 63rd St, Suite 200

Oklahoma City, OK 73116-1504


Or you may use my contact form.


Competitive Fee Structure


… but if you are looking for the cheapest fees, or obsessing about your correct pronouns or global warming/white privilege B.S., or unable to make up your mind as to whether you are a man or a woman, you would be so much happier working with someone else…

… in addition, due to an extremely hectic schedule, only serious inquiries may expect a response …

New tax clients are expected to provide copies of their last 3 years of tax returns and provide permission to contact prior accountant to resolve any issues, if necessary.


Regretfully, I am unable to accept new clients who have unfiled prior-year’s tax returns, who are not current with all prior tax obligations, are involved in any marijuana-related business ventures, use marijuana or illegal drugs, have any income from gambling, invest in cryptocurrency, are experiencing extreme financial difficulties, are personal-injury attorneys, in the construction industry or are in the country illegally. Newly formed businesses are frowned upon as well.


Though not required, supporters of President Donald J. Trump, Governor Kevin Stitt, the National Rifle Association & clients who are alpha males & females, ethical, hard-working, cheerful, optimistic and NOT easily offended are generally preferred.



Due to the alleged gang activity and drug dealing at the nearby Chelsea Manor Apts. & 7-11 Convenience Store, I would personally recommend "packing some heat" while in this area (and perhaps Penn Square Mall as well). Some believe the OKC Police Dept. has become too constrained and are hesitant to confront these gangbangers and put them behind bars where they rightfully belong. "Talk on the Street" seems to be that this emanates from an extremely weak & naive Mayor who purportedly suffers from a severe case of "Low T," a weak City Manager, a new, effeminate-looking Police Chief, who refuses to enforce our nation's immigration laws & a Ward 6 Council Girl who took her Oath Of Office using a book on Marxism.

Everything that Mayor David “Pajama Boy” Holt & Police Chief “Wily” Wade Gourley need to know to improve law enforcement in OKC is in this book…if only they had some courage...

Calm Guide Sheet by Greg Karnes on Scribd

Make The University of Oklahoma Great Again!


(Let us return to the time before the “Loudmouth Communist Snowflakes” and the less than competent financial administrators arrived on campus)


NOVEMBER 23, 2014



FEBRUARY 16, 2015





NOVEMBER 22, 2014



Top 10

Taxpayer Enemies


Those Individuals Or Groups Who Seem Most Intent On Penalizing Success & Achievement & Desiring A Return To The Days Of Low Economic Growth During The Jimmy Carter/Barry Obama - "Sleepy Joe" Biden Era


(in order, as of today)

The Caracas Caucus


(the Top 10 “Americans” who seem most hell-bent on destroying our jobs & economy in order to advance the cause of centralized government control over our lives and private businesses to the point where we are forced to surrender our individual liberties to the state)

The Terrorist Caucus


Those Individuals Or Groups Who

Come Across  To Me As Ambivalent Towards Islamic

Terror Activities

The "Soft On Crime"

"Hug-A-Thug" Caucus


The Top 10 Individuals Or Groups Who

Come Across  To Me As Coddling The Criminal Element At The Expense Of The Public Safety Of  Law-Abiding Citizens

The “Ugly” Caucus


The Top 10 Individuals On The Taxpayer Payroll That Strike Me As Being Just As Unattractive On The Inside As They Are On The Outside.




The United States leads the world in CO2 reductions

Is the individual depicted above the most ill-prepared person Oklahoma has ever had in a General Election for a U.S. Senate seat?